What Works Skin — Independent · Evidence-First · Ad-FreeIssue 014 · 20 April 2026 · Next: 04 Maywhatworksskin.com

Trend Watch · Issue 009 · 09 February 2026

ARCHIVE
Issue 009

Methylene blue, NMN, and the longevity-skincare overlap

Three supplements crossed over from the longevity world into our inbox. One of them is interesting.

Signed — Dr. Paul + Dr. Sundeep

Verdict № 01
01
Tier B

Topical methylene blue

Real, Modest

Methylene blue is a redox dye with bona fide mitochondrial activity in vitro and on cultured skin fibroblasts. Two small human studies suggest improvements in elasticity and wound healing endpoints over 12 weeks. The molecule is real; the formulations available to consumers are inconsistent in concentration and stability. Worth following — not yet worth recommending as part of a routine.

Bottom line

Genuine science. Premature consumer category. Hold.

Verdict № 02
02
Tier D

Oral NMN for skin

Skip

Nicotinamide mononucleotide is a precursor to NAD+, with interesting longevity literature in mice. The human skin-specific data is essentially absent. The supplement market has nonetheless built a multi-hundred-dollar-per-month category around skin claims that the literature does not support. If you want the niacinamide pathway worked on, use topical 4–5% niacinamide — which has 20+ years of replicated dermatology evidence behind it.

Bottom line

Save the money. Use topical niacinamide instead.

Verdict № 03
03
Tier B

Glycine + NAC stack

Partly True

The glycine + N-acetylcysteine combination (often sold as 'GlyNAC') has small but interesting RCT data on glutathione restoration in older adults. The skin-specific implications — antioxidant capacity, possibly inflammatory acne benefit via NAC — are extrapolations rather than direct findings. Reasonable for adults over 50 with multiple inflammatory drivers; overpromised for everyone else.

Bottom line

Defensible for older adults. Not a youth elixir.